Let me put them into sweaters for you!
Better with sound off and one hand on the mouse.
written by quantumushroom
That's like asking "Why are tacos so good?" They just ARE.
Some things don't need to be questioned. :)
written by videosiftbannedme
I don't buy the "doggie style" argument.
It's more likely that full breasts are a sign of health, along with an ability to feed offspring. A girl with no boobs would be less likely to raise offspring successfully, especially if their small breasts were due to a lack of nutrition from disease and such.
Men who were attracted to women with tiny boobs (in the distant past) would have been less likely to pass their DNA on to future generations.
written by Psychologic
^ except that other apes have breasts that are not large and is not a sign that they are healthy or able to have more children. Evolution isn't an exact science anyway, big boobs could just be the offset of some other natural occurrence. The sexuality about them isn't always there in every culture either. Some fantasize about necklines, lips, butts, ect.
written by GeeSussFreeK
>> ^GeeSussFreeK:
^ except that other apes have breasts that are not large and is not a sign that they are healthy or able to have more children. Evolution isn't an exact science anyway, big boobs could just be the offset of some other natural occurrence. The sexuality about them isn't always there in every culture either. Some fantasize about necklines, lips, butts, ect.
I just said it was more likely than the hypothesis in the video. That was the most likely cause I could think of off-hand that would cause more children from boob-loving men to survive over time. There was also an article in New Scientist that theorizes that the evolution of large breasts was due to the human face being flat relative to apes. A human infant with a flat face would be much more likely to suffocate while feeding on a flat breast than an ape infant, since apes have a more protruding jaw line and such. As an effect, babies from men that prefer larger breasts would have a higher survival rate.
^ except that other apes have breasts that are not large and is not a sign that they are healthy or able to have more children. Evolution isn't an exact science anyway, big boobs could just be the offset of some other natural occurrence. The sexuality about them isn't always there in every culture either. Some fantasize about necklines, lips, butts, ect.
I just said it was more likely than the hypothesis in the video. That was the most likely cause I could think of off-hand that would cause more children from boob-loving men to survive over time. There was also an article in New Scientist that theorizes that the evolution of large breasts was due to the human face being flat relative to apes. A human infant with a flat face would be much more likely to suffocate while feeding on a flat breast than an ape infant, since apes have a more protruding jaw line and such. As an effect, babies from men that prefer larger breasts would have a higher survival rate.
written by Psychologic
*sweatermeat
written by gwiz665
*dead -- " This video is unavailable. "
written by ant
NICE! :)
ReplyDelete