Are you eye glazingly numbed with the Foley thing yet?

I've got some questions that haven't been answered yet by the Media Echo-Spin Machine, ok?

Now that I've finally figured out that it was real IMs- as opposed to text messages;

I haven't yet heard how the Dems got IMs that were what, five years old? Did one of them save their side? Was it on a Government computer server that automatically archives anything? Did the Libs running AOL, Yahoo, MSN, or the other IMs dig it up on their own as a gift to their fellow travelers in D.C?

If the Republicans came out with this. Instead of a rush off the cliff, the Dems would phananx-up to defend their perv and start demanding to know how the information came to light. It happend about a year ago, but I can't remember the names or exact circumstance.

Ok, Foley was having cyber-sex with a 16 year-old male page. In D.C. that's the age of consent- AND I'd like to remind you it was CYBERSEX not the real touchy-feely kind.
As a matter of fact, lets go back to the LAST time a Congressman had a REAL homosexual liasion with a page:

Studds faced controversy in 1983 when one of his former pages revealed that he had had a sexual relationship with the congressman some ten years earlier. During the course of the House Ethics Committee's investigation, Studds publicly acknowledged his homosexuality, a disclosure that, according to an article in the Washington Post, "apparently was not news to many of his constituents."

In an address to the House, Studds stated, "It is not a simple task for any of us to meet adequately the obligations of either public or private life, let alone both, but these challenges are made substantially more complex when one is, as I am, both an elected public official and gay."

The House voted to censure Studds in July 1983. Although there was some adverse reaction in his district, a poll of registered voters conducted by the Quincy, Massachusetts Patriot Ledger revealed that 65 percent favored his remaining in office while only 28 percent thought that he should resign and 7 percent expressed no opinion.

Returned to Congress by his constituents in 1984,,,

And I'd like to remind you that that was before we had the loose morals we have today, thanks to the Gay/Lesbian actavists involved in "normalizing" homosexuality.


So, can we get those Liberal attack dogs to STFup already.


Hypocracy, thy name is Democrat.


(UPDATE) Out of curiosity, WHO were you IMing and what were you saying in 2001 that you might like to keep from the public airwaves?