Because the three new Congressional districts are going to be decided by the US Supreme Court- in a blow to Democrat machinations of the legal system.
The court issued a brief order late Friday that applies to electoral maps drawn by federal judges in San Antonio for the Texas Legislature and Congress that would have ensured (ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS) minorities made up the majority in three additional Texas congressional districts. The justices said they will hear arguments on Jan. 9.
The (Democrat appointed)judges issued the new maps for the 2012 election in Texas after a lawsuit was filed in San Antonio over redistricting maps drawn by the GOP-led. The maps were to remain in place until the lawsuit was resolved.
...Just like TEN YEARS AGO when they tried to steal those new congressional districts for (illegal) 'Latino' voters. This year it's more of the same Democrat interference under color of law.
Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst said the court's decision shows the federal judges in San Antonio "overreached and displayed judicial activism inconsistent with federal law and contrary to the intent of the Legislature."
As usual when you have Liberals on the bench.
State Rep. Trey Martinez Fischer, the leader of the Mexican-American Legislative Caucus, which participated in the San Antonio lawsuit, said it was "deeply concerned" about the potential disruption of the 2012 election schedule.
"Our resolve remains stronger than ever and our commitment to minority voting rights unwavering," he said in a statement. "If there ever was a textbook case of Voting Rights Act violations, this is it. We look forward to making our case before the United States Supreme Court."
Lawmakers redraw districts every 10 years to reflect changes in population reported by the census, and Texas is adding four U.S. House seats based on population gains in the 2010 census. Texas' Republican-controlled Legislature drew up new maps earlier this year (just like Democrats do when they're in charge- it's in the Constitution), but minority groups sued in federal court in San Antonio, claiming the plan didn't reflect the growth in the state's Hispanic and black populations.
Because most are ILLEGAL and can't legally vote?
The San Antonio court issued new maps while it decided the case. The judges reasoned that the state would be unable to hold elections without the temporary maps.
...And we might even be able to force an election based on them!
Farging Democrats have always been trying to steal elections in Texas, either from voter intimidation (The Klan) to actually murdering people over ballot boxes.
Saturday, December 10, 2011
The Euro is heading for an explosive crash
MF Global lost Billions of dollars of client money- and the Democrat former Senator and Ex-Governor of New Jersey doesn't know where it went.
Why is this man smiling?
...Because he made over $8 Billion last year.
...because he's been dealing in questionable currency trades since he was turning in his own people to the NAZIS in Hungary and Poland- and came out very comfortable because of it.
Why is this man smiling?
...Because he made over $8 Billion last year.
...because he's been dealing in questionable currency trades since he was turning in his own people to the NAZIS in Hungary and Poland- and came out very comfortable because of it.
Friday, December 09, 2011
Does anyone remember, way back
...So far back that it's ancient history now.
But at one time Micheal Jackson wasn't white.
REALLY!
See!
He got his skin bleached and his body surgically changed.
But it didn't affect his genes.
So how can a black guy really be expected to produce half of this? Seriously?
But at one time Micheal Jackson wasn't white.
REALLY!
See!
He got his skin bleached and his body surgically changed.
But it didn't affect his genes.
So how can a black guy really be expected to produce half of this? Seriously?
Food pr()n
Don't look, ladies- or you will have committed the sin of ....ummmmm....disobeying a fatwa from some mouth breathing muslimb 'scholar'.
..Because we 'know' it turns you on, and in muslimb-land, that's a bad thing...because it takes time away from the goatze.
..Because we 'know' it turns you on, and in muslimb-land, that's a bad thing...because it takes time away from the goatze.
Omens
Do you believe in them?
On this current job that really turned out to be NOT how it was presented, and with less pay and hours than was presented -gave me am omen within 2 miles of leaving my interview. I almost got T-boned by some Mexican creeping through a stop sign.
..Should have said no.
This new one.
I left the house at 5:30 to take a trencher down to Carrizo Springs and got back to the yard about noon (some 300 miles). Ran fuel to the equipment that needed it and didn't get a chance to leave early.
I filled up my truck in San Antonio and high-tailed it to Gonzalas for a piss test for the new job.
I got there (75 miles from fill-up and 95 minutes) 10 minutes too late for the sample people to take a sample on Friday. Because it's Friday and even if the sign says 5:00PM- that's not 'really' right (smile).
Ok, I'm learning- called them up andregretfully told them that I'm not going to make another 200 mile trip just to pee in a bottle.
Especially if I'm the one paying for gas.
I got home at about 7:10 tonight.
On this current job that really turned out to be NOT how it was presented, and with less pay and hours than was presented -gave me am omen within 2 miles of leaving my interview. I almost got T-boned by some Mexican creeping through a stop sign.
..Should have said no.
This new one.
I left the house at 5:30 to take a trencher down to Carrizo Springs and got back to the yard about noon (some 300 miles). Ran fuel to the equipment that needed it and didn't get a chance to leave early.
I filled up my truck in San Antonio and high-tailed it to Gonzalas for a piss test for the new job.
I got there (75 miles from fill-up and 95 minutes) 10 minutes too late for the sample people to take a sample on Friday. Because it's Friday and even if the sign says 5:00PM- that's not 'really' right (smile).
Ok, I'm learning- called them up and
Especially if I'm the one paying for gas.
I got home at about 7:10 tonight.
Well, swat my momma and call me a car...
John Corzine the DEMOCRAT former Senator and Ex-Governor of New Jersey says they can't find the money their clients lost in MF Global.
He says he's "stunned" because they looked everywhere. Even under the couch cushions and in the old suits hanging in the closet.
As usual, we won't be hearing about this in the MSM as we would if it were say--ENRON or Bernie Madoff, because Libs always go out of their way to protect their own, right Global Crossing?
Now, you all play nice, I'm off to deliver a trencher to Carrizo Springs.
He says he's "stunned" because they looked everywhere. Even under the couch cushions and in the old suits hanging in the closet.
As usual, we won't be hearing about this in the MSM as we would if it were say--ENRON or Bernie Madoff, because Libs always go out of their way to protect their own, right Global Crossing?
Now, you all play nice, I'm off to deliver a trencher to Carrizo Springs.
Thursday, December 08, 2011
What happened to the magical anti-gun spell?
Isn't that what they did the last time they had a shooter at VA Tech?
They made it doubly unlawful to carry a gun on campus, so no-one would be able to ever do it again- until today.
They made it doubly unlawful to carry a gun on campus, so no-one would be able to ever do it again- until today.
I hope Eric Holder realizes
That in real life- Joe McCarthy was right about the Communist threat.
Not the way you Liberals whitewash that entire history.
But what do you care? Hollywood is still full of anti-American socialists and the Federal bureaucracy is full of fellow travelers working to pie any conservative idea and being protected by unions.
Not the way you Liberals whitewash that entire history.
But what do you care? Hollywood is still full of anti-American socialists and the Federal bureaucracy is full of fellow travelers working to pie any conservative idea and being protected by unions.
Wednesday, December 07, 2011
Zero tolerance sucks, doesn't it Principle Bostic?
See, that principle is the one who suspended a little black kid for calling a teacher 'cute'. I haven't seen a pic of the teacher in question, but being as Principle Bostic holds a high position in a (usually) extremely Liberal calling- that the teacher is white (hence the over-reaction to keep the darky in his place).
But anyway, Karma came calling, and someone is taking early retirement because of it.
The best line of the entire article...
"One mistake in 44 years, and I'm not given the benefit of the doubt. I really don't believe I was treated fairly,"
That's ok principle- I'm sure there are plenty of people you railroaded that would say the same thing.
But anyway, Karma came calling, and someone is taking early retirement because of it.
The best line of the entire article...
"One mistake in 44 years, and I'm not given the benefit of the doubt. I really don't believe I was treated fairly,"
That's ok principle- I'm sure there are plenty of people you railroaded that would say the same thing.
70 years ago today
We got suckerpunched-
Then we fought TWO wars the way they should have been fought and won decisively-
We didn't "Seize" anything. There was no Imperialism in doing the right thing.
Then we used our money and aide to help our fallen foes and turn them into vibrant economies.
That's the last time we fought a war to win.
Then we fought TWO wars the way they should have been fought and won decisively-
We didn't "Seize" anything. There was no Imperialism in doing the right thing.
Then we used our money and aide to help our fallen foes and turn them into vibrant economies.
That's the last time we fought a war to win.
Just out of curiosity
Does anyone have and use OnStar?
I've been wondering for a while- why would anyone pay for that? If you listen to the radio commercials and their fake scripts. It makes me wonder if those operators really sound all warbely and distorted, like they're bouncing off seven satellites to get to the PD across town.
OS: "HellO PD tHIs iS ONstAR CaLLinG AbouT a SevEn yeAr olD kiD WhO sAys hiS Mom Is fREaking hIm oUT By drIVing sO CApPiLLy."
Officer Obie: Hello, son- I understand that you mom is a hazard right now.
Billy:" YEs oFFiCER obIE, Her eYEs arE gLAssy and SHe keEPs tRYinG tO SWalLOw hEr tONGue!
I'M oNLy SEVeN YeARs OLd!"
Officer Obie: "Is she a Diabetic?Or is she some kind of drug addled maniac?"
Billy;"YeS."
Officer Obie:" OK, Billy -we'll have someone ther in a jiffy."
W00p-wOOP.
Billy:"YaY! tHE poLICe arE HeRE!"
OnStar:" THanK yoU OfFIcer oBIe for PuTTinG up wITh my CrAPpy lANDlINe so We CAn shOW oFf hoW We SuCk as A SerVIce ProvIDer."
Doesn't seven year old Billy who programs everything electronic at home know how to call 911?
And why would you pay to get OnStar installed so the .GOV can track you wherever you go....and volunteer to pay them for the privilege?
I've been wondering for a while- why would anyone pay for that? If you listen to the radio commercials and their fake scripts. It makes me wonder if those operators really sound all warbely and distorted, like they're bouncing off seven satellites to get to the PD across town.
OS: "HellO PD tHIs iS ONstAR CaLLinG AbouT a SevEn yeAr olD kiD WhO sAys hiS Mom Is fREaking hIm oUT By drIVing sO CApPiLLy."
Officer Obie: Hello, son- I understand that you mom is a hazard right now.
Billy:" YEs oFFiCER obIE, Her eYEs arE gLAssy and SHe keEPs tRYinG tO SWalLOw hEr tONGue!
I'M oNLy SEVeN YeARs OLd!"
Officer Obie: "Is she a Diabetic?
Billy;"YeS."
Officer Obie:" OK, Billy -we'll have someone ther in a jiffy."
W00p-wOOP.
Billy:"YaY! tHE poLICe arE HeRE!"
OnStar:" THanK yoU OfFIcer oBIe for PuTTinG up wITh my CrAPpy lANDlINe so We CAn shOW oFf hoW We SuCk as A SerVIce ProvIDer."
Doesn't seven year old Billy who programs everything electronic at home know how to call 911?
And why would you pay to get OnStar installed so the .GOV can track you wherever you go....and volunteer to pay them for the privilege?
Tuesday, December 06, 2011
I aim to please
You didn't like Leeanns Matrix #5
How about "Die Hard" in 30 seconds?
...With bunnies!!
Or "Sweet child of mine" in strings?
How about "Die Hard" in 30 seconds?
...With bunnies!!
Or "Sweet child of mine" in strings?
Monday, December 05, 2011
If this doosh showed up at my bar
First of all he probably wouldn't because I usually do my outside drinking at a VFW or American Legion hall...
But if I were somewhere else...
I'd have to ask the bartender for the cheapest tap beer they had in a plastic cup.....
But if I were somewhere else...
I'd have to ask the bartender for the cheapest tap beer they had in a plastic cup.....
Sunday, December 04, 2011
First it's Gun Runner
and the ATF, FBI, et al giving Mexican drug dealers weapons, now it's the DEA laundering money for those same cartels.
What's next, importing underage hookers by the HHS?
What's next, importing underage hookers by the HHS?
Why is it...
That since the iWON took over in DeeCee, that we no longer have 18 million illegals, but only 11 million from the mouths of politicians on both sides? (Michell Bachman last night)
I know the economy sucks, but did almost 50% go back to mexico?
OR, is someone playing with numbers for political games?
I know the economy sucks, but did almost 50% go back to mexico?
OR, is someone playing with numbers for political games?
The Cain train
Now that the only real conservative with real-life business experience is gone-
If you were a Cain backer who will you get behind now?
Since I didn't make a post about the last poll, here's the link to the poll site. As usual, you can still vote, but it doesn't count anymore.
In our last poll we had 172 total votes and only three choices made a two digit number.
The candidate with the most people saying they would never vote for them was Mitt with 63 votes @ 37%, congrats Mitt Romney, you win the pie right above the choice for swallowing mouth-puke with 62 votes @36% and the Ross Perot of the Republican party- Ron Paul with a hearty 21 votes @12%.
Every one else was in the mid to low single digits which is about where I am.
If you were a Cain backer who will you get behind now?
Since I didn't make a post about the last poll, here's the link to the poll site. As usual, you can still vote, but it doesn't count anymore.
In our last poll we had 172 total votes and only three choices made a two digit number.
The candidate with the most people saying they would never vote for them was Mitt with 63 votes @ 37%, congrats Mitt Romney, you win the pie right above the choice for swallowing mouth-puke with 62 votes @36% and the Ross Perot of the Republican party- Ron Paul with a hearty 21 votes @12%.
Every one else was in the mid to low single digits which is about where I am.
Saturday, December 03, 2011
A great rant
Epic, even from a guest blogger at Blonde Sagacity.
So this is the middle of an answer to the D.Koz about why Joe and Josephine six-pac booed the First Wookie at NASCAR;
~snip~
And please Liberals, spare me all the feigned outrage. I'm still being nicer to Michele than you were Bristol Palin.
Yeah it's personal and mean, and we don't care. In case you haven't figured it out progressives, we're so over being nice to you. When this Presidency began, I had some differences of opinion with the President and his entourage but it wasn't personal. As the years and arrogance out of the administration went on however... well frankly I've grown to just not like these people. Bill Clinton? I don't agree with him but I could have a beer with that guy. Not these folks. If the President offered to have a beer with me I'd turn him down. I don't like him, his staff, or his family... or his politics. I think he's a prick, and I don't care for his wife either. Clinton was a real guy... god love him... ruthless, cunning, salacious, but a real guy. The Obama's are not, they're the quintessential limousine liberals. Arrogant elites looking down at "bitter clingers" like me. Well Obamas, thanks but no thanks. Go away. Think about it. You can see Bill Clinton at that NASCAR race, chilly dog and big gulp in hand, hitting on the track girls having a ball... and you know he'd be the life of the party. Bill's lost some weight and all, but when he gets in the moment you know he'd be eating a turkey leg and eyeing the beer bong. The Obama's would be meticulously trying not to shake too many hands to avoid getting dirty. Clinton would be giving you a drunken hug.
The Obama's are over scripted, hyped, handled and fake. People hate a fake, and loath an arrogant one.
Straight from the fingers of Free0352.
Gawd, I wish I could write like that.
So this is the middle of an answer to the D.Koz about why Joe and Josephine six-pac booed the First Wookie at NASCAR;
~snip~
And please Liberals, spare me all the feigned outrage. I'm still being nicer to Michele than you were Bristol Palin.
Yeah it's personal and mean, and we don't care. In case you haven't figured it out progressives, we're so over being nice to you. When this Presidency began, I had some differences of opinion with the President and his entourage but it wasn't personal. As the years and arrogance out of the administration went on however... well frankly I've grown to just not like these people. Bill Clinton? I don't agree with him but I could have a beer with that guy. Not these folks. If the President offered to have a beer with me I'd turn him down. I don't like him, his staff, or his family... or his politics. I think he's a prick, and I don't care for his wife either. Clinton was a real guy... god love him... ruthless, cunning, salacious, but a real guy. The Obama's are not, they're the quintessential limousine liberals. Arrogant elites looking down at "bitter clingers" like me. Well Obamas, thanks but no thanks. Go away. Think about it. You can see Bill Clinton at that NASCAR race, chilly dog and big gulp in hand, hitting on the track girls having a ball... and you know he'd be the life of the party. Bill's lost some weight and all, but when he gets in the moment you know he'd be eating a turkey leg and eyeing the beer bong. The Obama's would be meticulously trying not to shake too many hands to avoid getting dirty. Clinton would be giving you a drunken hug.
The Obama's are over scripted, hyped, handled and fake. People hate a fake, and loath an arrogant one.
Straight from the fingers of Free0352.
Gawd, I wish I could write like that.
One more reason NOT to vote for Mittens
The elitist Senator from Alaska Lisa Murkowski has endorsed Mitt Romneycare.
...And he's proud of it:
Mitt Romney: “I am proud to announce the support of Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski. I look forward to working with her to expand Alaska’s energy production, bring jobs back to the state, and help get our country on the right track again.”
Straight from the people who know her best comes this truthful statement:
muzungu December 2nd 11:45 A.M (Anchorage Daily News):
Oh boy, what a surprise --- the kneejerk pro-status-quo, pro-everything-Establishment Lisa "Daddy, I want a Senate seat!" Murkowski has endorsed the most rabidly pro-status-quo of all the Republican presidential candidates. Color me unsurprised. That woman, and her chosen candidate, represents EVERYTHING that is wrong with American politics today --- a blinkered, power-pandering, self-interested, public-be-damned, short-sighted devotion to furthering the interests of the corrupt and sociopathic financial and political elite above all else.
AND this news on top of finding out that one of the few remaining Republican candidates let the MSM win by bringing up 1996 tactics of personal destruction.
I guess that $100 bill you drug though those trailer parks was a good investment this time Rahm.
...And he's proud of it:
Mitt Romney: “I am proud to announce the support of Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski. I look forward to working with her to expand Alaska’s energy production, bring jobs back to the state, and help get our country on the right track again.”
Straight from the people who know her best comes this truthful statement:
muzungu December 2nd 11:45 A.M (Anchorage Daily News):
Oh boy, what a surprise --- the kneejerk pro-status-quo, pro-everything-Establishment Lisa "Daddy, I want a Senate seat!" Murkowski has endorsed the most rabidly pro-status-quo of all the Republican presidential candidates. Color me unsurprised. That woman, and her chosen candidate, represents EVERYTHING that is wrong with American politics today --- a blinkered, power-pandering, self-interested, public-be-damned, short-sighted devotion to furthering the interests of the corrupt and sociopathic financial and political elite above all else.
AND this news on top of finding out that one of the few remaining Republican candidates let the MSM win by bringing up 1996 tactics of personal destruction.
I guess that $100 bill you drug though those trailer parks was a good investment this time Rahm.
I guess this needs to be banned next
That was my second thought.
My first thought was "I'm surprised that it's not taking off their shoulders."
More at The Blaze (with an annoying pop-up that makes me not want to go there again- GLENN)
My first thought was "I'm surprised that it's not taking off their shoulders."
More at The Blaze (with an annoying pop-up that makes me not want to go there again- GLENN)
So... We can expect a lawsuit at anytime
For Kali bypassing Federal immigration laws, right? Just like they did to Arizona, Arkansas,
Because only the Fed should be deciding what to do about illegals.
And I suppose that instead of cutting off their US taxpayer money- we'll see the Democrat controlled Senate increase the free money so they can 'integrate' them better.
Ummmm....why do they think only 1 million 'undocumented guest workers' and 'Latin tourists' will be moving there for the free goodies? But, then again there's that law of unintended consequences that I somehow always seem to call before it happens.
Because only the Fed should be deciding what to do about illegals.
And I suppose that instead of cutting off their US taxpayer money- we'll see the Democrat controlled Senate increase the free money so they can 'integrate' them better.
Ummmm....why do they think only 1 million 'undocumented guest workers' and 'Latin tourists' will be moving there for the free goodies? But, then again there's that law of unintended consequences that I somehow always seem to call before it happens.
For all of you gunnies
Who know more than me...
What is "steel investment" , and is that good on a pistol?
BTW North- here's a good gunblog I didn't see on your list.
What is "steel investment" , and is that good on a pistol?
BTW North- here's a good gunblog I didn't see on your list.
Friday, December 02, 2011
If you committed perjury by mail- or whatever they call it
Do you think you'd be able to just..."withdraw" it nine months later?
You know, like it never happened and no-one even saw it to do any expensive work to do research on it.
Under fire for losing track of weapons that turned up at crime scenes along the Southwest border, the Justice Department has taken the extraordinary step of formally withdrawing an inaccurate letter about the episode that it sent to Congress earlier this year.
Because we're not just breaking laws for a political aim- we're incompetent to boot.
Misleading Congress can be a prosecutable offense if a person who makes the statements knows they are false. But Attorney General Eric Holder has told lawmakers that so far he has no evidence anyone intended to deceive them. The matter remains under investigation not only by Republicans in Congress but also the Justice Department's inspector general.
Yes! Get Inspector Clouseau on the case immediately.
.... NINE months. That's as long as a fetus is in the womb -if you're not a Liberal.
You know, like it never happened and no-one even saw it to do any expensive work to do research on it.
Under fire for losing track of weapons that turned up at crime scenes along the Southwest border, the Justice Department has taken the extraordinary step of formally withdrawing an inaccurate letter about the episode that it sent to Congress earlier this year.
Because we're not just breaking laws for a political aim- we're incompetent to boot.
Misleading Congress can be a prosecutable offense if a person who makes the statements knows they are false. But Attorney General Eric Holder has told lawmakers that so far he has no evidence anyone intended to deceive them. The matter remains under investigation not only by Republicans in Congress but also the Justice Department's inspector general.
Yes! Get Inspector Clouseau on the case immediately.
.... NINE months. That's as long as a fetus is in the womb -if you're not a Liberal.
Speaking of environmentalists and hippies
How many of the people in this video do you think are making policy now?
Meet Rachel Carson
The one person who without a government backing her- killed more people than many tin pot dictators.
You might not recognize her name, but you may have heard of her book.
That book was the beginnings of the scientific "consensus" way of looking at the world.
You know, instead of actually using verifiable facts- we cherry pick the ones we want and emotionalize them.
Then we print a book that eco-tards go wild over and start banning chemicals which were getting disease vectors under control.
When Rachel Carson's Silent Spring was published in 1962, it generated a storm of controversy over the use of chemical pesticides. Miss Carson's intent in writing Silent Spring was to warn the public of the dangers associated with pesticide use. Throughout her book are numerous case studies documenting the harmful effects that chemical pesticides have had on the environment. Along with these facts, she explains how in many instances the pesticides have done more harm than good in eradicating the pests they were designed to destroy. In addition to her reports on pesticide use, Miss Carson points out that many of the long-term effects that these chemicals may have on the environment, as well as on humans, are still unknown. Her book as one critic wrote, "dealt pesticides a sharp blow" (Senior Scholastic 1962). The controversy sparked by Silent Spring led to the enactment of environmental legislation and the establishment of government agencies to better regulate the use of these chemicals.
Happy birfday EPA, I hope it's your last one!
You might not recognize her name, but you may have heard of her book.
That book was the beginnings of the scientific "consensus" way of looking at the world.
You know, instead of actually using verifiable facts- we cherry pick the ones we want and emotionalize them.
Then we print a book that eco-tards go wild over and start banning chemicals which were getting disease vectors under control.
When Rachel Carson's Silent Spring was published in 1962, it generated a storm of controversy over the use of chemical pesticides. Miss Carson's intent in writing Silent Spring was to warn the public of the dangers associated with pesticide use. Throughout her book are numerous case studies documenting the harmful effects that chemical pesticides have had on the environment. Along with these facts, she explains how in many instances the pesticides have done more harm than good in eradicating the pests they were designed to destroy. In addition to her reports on pesticide use, Miss Carson points out that many of the long-term effects that these chemicals may have on the environment, as well as on humans, are still unknown. Her book as one critic wrote, "dealt pesticides a sharp blow" (Senior Scholastic 1962). The controversy sparked by Silent Spring led to the enactment of environmental legislation and the establishment of government agencies to better regulate the use of these chemicals.
Happy birfday EPA, I hope it's your last one!
Thursday, December 01, 2011
Federalize them, then fire them all
60,000 union thugs are holding the economy of 305,000,000 Americans hostage to their greed.
Nice...I'm sure it's a Federal crime to interfere with railroad traffic- if WE did it.
But if the THUGS at the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees and the American Train Dispatchers Association do it, all they get is more union bennies paid by the working class and the 99% who are againstunion corporate greed.
Nice...I'm sure it's a Federal crime to interfere with railroad traffic- if WE did it.
But if the THUGS at the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees and the American Train Dispatchers Association do it, all they get is more union bennies paid by the working class and the 99% who are against
Mittens, if you think Bret Baier was bad...
So the candidate from Central Casting was asked some hard-ish questions by Bret Bair on Fox News the other night, and he didn't like it.
Mitt Romney's cantankerous side emerged again last night during a Fox News interview during which Bret Baier pushed the presidential candidate on his several position changes over the years. What made Romney's frustration last night different from its past occurrences was that this time it happened in the comfy conservative confines of Fox News instead of on the debate floor.
So, did you happen to see what the MSM did to their favorite RINO during the last election- the 'maverick' John McCain?
If you can't even handle some semi-tough questions without getting pissed, how are you going to handle the hate-filled slanted questions coming from the sycophant of the 0bama media?
They haven't gotten close to being hard on you, because they want YOU to be the one running against their Chicago Jeezus- because they know you'd lose.
UPDATE
Because it's not worth it's own post.
Mitt Romneycare isn't even man enough to attack Newt.
He has to have a fellow Yankee RINO do the dirty work so he doesn't muss his hair- or something.
Yeah, show us more of that inner Mitt:
Mitt Romney's cantankerous side emerged again last night during a Fox News interview during which Bret Baier pushed the presidential candidate on his several position changes over the years. What made Romney's frustration last night different from its past occurrences was that this time it happened in the comfy conservative confines of Fox News instead of on the debate floor.
So, did you happen to see what the MSM did to their favorite RINO during the last election- the 'maverick' John McCain?
If you can't even handle some semi-tough questions without getting pissed, how are you going to handle the hate-filled slanted questions coming from the sycophant of the 0bama media?
They haven't gotten close to being hard on you, because they want YOU to be the one running against their Chicago Jeezus- because they know you'd lose.
UPDATE
Because it's not worth it's own post.
Mitt Romneycare isn't even man enough to attack Newt.
He has to have a fellow Yankee RINO do the dirty work so he doesn't muss his hair- or something.
Yeah, show us more of that inner Mitt:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)