Sunday, February 12, 2012

Guess where

I'm going to take out the names and places, guess who and where they're talking about.


XXXXXXX-- Xxxx election observers say that presidential hopefuls running against Xxxx-Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx face "biased" reports by Xxxx-controlled media and constant government pressure.

Tiny Cox, who heads the Council of Zzzzz mission to Xxxxx, said Saturday that all four candidates complain that Xxxxx's government is using its "administrative resources" to influence voters, while Xxxxx television extensively covers Xxxx's activities.


Link will be in comments later today.

All of you on the bandwagon for Willard

The ones who are now crowing about his two wins yesterday in The YANKEE state of Main (barely edging out Libertarian RP)- and the win at CPAC.

I'd like to remind you of what you said about the Santorum wins...It doesn't mean anything, you didn't get delegates from Maine.
 “In the long term [Santorum’s wins in Missouri, Minnesota, and Colorado\] it doesn’t matter,” said GOP strategist Dan Hazelwood told the Daily News, noting Santorum has simply found a niche in low-turnout, intensely conservatives caucuses.
As for CPAC- I'm glad you won, because the last winner in an election year was RON Paul- and we know ho well that went over.
It looks like the didn't have a CPAC voet in `04, or any for the previous four years of the LAST TIME they got it right in 2000 with Bush- or before.

Saturday, February 11, 2012

Guess?

What's that white stuff?

I have the TeeWee on as background noise

It's about the only reason I still have cable.

I just changed the channel from reruns of  'The Walking Dead" to SciFi SyFy and the 2012 adaptation of  Jules Verns  'The Mysterious Island'.

What I've seen so far is a reporter from the New York Times being an annoying asshole, and a Southern boy who's the Hollywood idea of a Southern racist (I guess they got the verbiage from their buddies when they know blacks aren't around I'll be watching a rerun-

Thanks for ruining a good book Hollywood.

If was a betting man

I'd lay money down that Nohl Rosen is an Obama loving Liberal.

Who is Nohl Rosen you ask?
He's a guy who saw that Doritos commercial about the Great Dane burying a cat collar.
This one:

And why do you think he's a dark blue Liberal, Kurt?
Because he's got about ten cats and has started a petition to get that Doritos commercial off-air.
-And he's boycotting Frito-Lay and Pepsi until they censor themselves for him...and the other PETArds who want to sign his petition.

You can got to Murphy s place to get the whole story because he deserves the hits and not cat-boy.

Kind of sad in a way

But it does kind of show the hand of chance.
94 years ago an Allied shell landed on a German underground shelter on the Western Front. 21 Germans were buried alive and only recently were discovered.

This makes Planed Parenthood sad :-(

I found this chart from a blog I can't remember now (sorry) that has this chart showing how young adults are coping with the 0bameny.
But HEY! at least they got Komen to cave!

Friday, February 10, 2012

That reminds me

I was on FB and one of the ads I noticed was this one:

and I wondered what's Laurie Dhue doing now?

Oh, I never thought of that!

I've only seen them used for two other things...

But now that you mention it...

Answering PISSED




AND for the guy from Hungary looking for "caroline wozniacki p---y", sorry wrong kind of shaved angry cat.

This new birth control mandate of the Constitutional Scholar

The one that mandates the Catholic Church to provide free contraceptive medicine for their employees, in spite of the First Amendments "separation" clause.

I've been trying to get a take on this in regards to how Liberals would feel if the State forced them to do something ...distasteful with what they look upon as a religion when I came upon this video of Joyless Behar and her take on the Texas law that requires a woman to listen to an ultrasound of her 'unviable tissue mass' before having an abortion.


No, you don't have to listen to the igrn't biatch- I'm just putting it up for perspective.
But she's saying that it's totalitarian in nature and shouldn't be forced,,,yadda, yadda, yadda....

Anyway, the same people who have no problem forcing a branch of the Christian Church to go against their core beliefs has a problem with anything that may slow down the abortion industry.

But then, I wouldn't expect anyone on the Left to see those subtle similarities...because it's not nuanced enough...

One MORE reason the Central Casting guy will never be elected

How can he defend himself against this?

He can explain all day,,,and buy himself full page ads-
But the fact is that Bo-bama rides in his OWN plane. So he can be in Hawaii and then jet back for a photo-op at PetSmart.

So, here I am at the computer

Just got done reading mail and was halfway through Mr. Johnson's post about 'Nam (yea, he posted twice in a month!) When I heard something in the wifes computer/craft room.
I looked in and one of the dogs was eating the cat food.

Thursday, February 09, 2012

Boy, dad's pissed

And I can imagine why having had two teen girls myself

And having the self-centered lazy one living here again-

What we need is commonsense TeeWee safety laws

To protect innocent children from the deadly effects of falling TeeWees.

CHICAGO – The deaths of four Chicago-area children since late October after TVs toppled on them are prompting calls for more safety measures and increased awareness.
~snip~
The Consumer Product Safety Commission says 169 children 8 and younger died between 2000 and 2010 from falling TVs. In all, 245 children died in that period after being crushed by TVs, furniture or appliances. More than 22,000 were treated for tip-over injuries each year from 2008 to 2010.

"This is not as uncommon as people might think, sadly," says John Drengenberg, consumer safety director at Underwriters Laboratories, which sets safety standards for TVs and other products. It puts TVs on a 10-degree incline and tests stability
.

Because we've been told continuously from the Left that  inanimate objects can take on a life of their own just to kill or main unsuspecting person.

So what does a good Liberal demand?

Gary Smith, a pediatric emergency physician in Columbus, Ohio, and president of the Child Injury Prevention Alliance, says requiring retailers to sell safety straps or mounting brackets with TVs would reduce the problem.

"We wouldn't purchase a car without seat belts," he says. "We shouldn't sell TVs without appropriate safety equipment.
"
Why yes- make a law to force people to be more safety conscious!

Wednesday, February 08, 2012

On personal self defense and leftists

I saw a picture on a tangentially related post about Rick Santorum just a while ago.

Can't remember the blog, but it was a pic of a Trotskyite being dragged out after glitterbombing him.
What do you think the reaction of the MSM would be if Rick or Newt cold-cocked the guy as he was tossing that glitter?

I'm sure the Left would be howling on anger about excessive violence and the Right would have a new hero.

Mitt Romney would be over in the corner explaining that his butler -Jeeves was the one designated to do the protecting in his house.

Amazing, isn't it?

That even Russian Commies in Siberia have video phones nowadays.
This is supposed to be a Mammoth crossing a river somewhere in the steppes.


But what's even more amazing is the detail that even my first gen videocam had that's lacking here.

Call me a skeptic, but it sure looks like a blurry elephant to me.

But what do I know? I think that AGW is made-up, and there could be enough Mammoth 'experts' around to come to a consensus and settle it with cooked computer mapping.

ZOmygawd- He's got a gun!

In school!


Why yes, back in 1956 they knew it was a good idea for kids to learn about fire arms.

I get search hits from .EDU domains

And except for the ones I know coming from bloggers, they're usually coming from a search engine looking for "shaved cats".

Then they must be shocked by the lack of awe I have for their Chocolate Jeezus and click out as soon as they see my header- them after composing themselves open that page again to see that shaved cat...I can almost guarantee K-12.edu will do it every time.

Dear Chrysler

or should I say FIAT, since they own you now-

Tuesday, February 07, 2012

Happy birthday Liz

I forgot yesterday-


(Don't try to understand the woman- you can't. I think she's talking Scots.)


But we did the screaming guitar anthem first (too).

UPDATE-
Listen to the first ten seconds of this-
You know if Jimmi tried that at #OWS, they'd run him out- right?

It must be that fine sense of nuance you get as you move up the Army Hierarchy

Because NOT allowing your Catholic Chaplains to read something that their Archbishop asked them to read to the troops isn't *really* censorship.

The Army said Tuesday that a request for chaplains not to read a letter in Sunday Mass that expressed disapproval of a new regulation in the Obama administration's health care law was not an attempt to "censor," but rather a cautionary move to preserve "military order and discipline."

Because we're afraid those bible-thumping Mackerel-snappers will mutiny (or whatever the Army calls it) over one line in a letter critical of the Chicago Jeezus and his policy of forcing the Church to go against it's beliefs.



"The Chief of Chaplains was concerned that one line in the 456-word letter could be misinterpreted as a call to civil disobedience within our nation's military ranks," the statement said.

A senior Army official separately confirmed that the offending line stated: "We cannot -- we will not -- comply with this unjust law." The official confirmed that "there was a worry that would be a call for civil obedience."

The Army statement went on to say that the chief of chaplains was not rendering a judgment on the letter's message, but acted only out of "concern that a single line might run counter to proper military order and discipline."
"Any suggestion that he or the Army were attempting to censor the clergy is not supported by the facts," the Army said.


Because one sentence in a church missive would upset 240 years of Army discipline.

You've got a lot of faith in your men there Chief Chaplain Rutherford.

A pre-buttle to November 7th and the Establishment party

Now that you're looking to blame all the voters that didn't swarm the polls to vote for the soggy piece of white toast you put in front of us -AGAIN.
You really need to look at WHY no-one showed up for the guy who bought his way into the race, and your usual status quo "it's his turn" ideas of no losing too badly.

You had good solid candidates at the beginning that I would have gladly voted for, but you and the rest of the so-called conservative punditry latched on to the only guy who would lose the election, because after losing to McCain- it was his turn to lose this election.

I don't know what the House and Senate look like, but I hope for the sake of out future that we have an unvetoable majority of conservatives so that there are some limits put on the wannabe dictator.

And for you people- GFY, I'm looking for a new party.

So, is Anonymous "hearting" Facebook right now?

Because I just played and won two games of Free Cell while it was trying to load- on both F/F and Exploder.

Monday, February 06, 2012

The harder I try, the worse I do

On this game of space filling.
I've got to level seven once, but have to start over every time.

BUT- on the better side of things, I've been awarded the "Liebster Award" from both Guffaw and Pissed.



Thank you both gentlemen.
And the rules are to pass it on to worthy blogs of 200 followers or less, so we'll be updating this as we go blogsurfing tonight.

UPDATE--
In no particular order (or the order they ended up on the blogroll).
  • We'll start out with Flares into Darkness for his eccentric posts and letting our future overlords do some mind bending for our own good. 
  • Then we have the wonderful Jennifer, who will go down in intratuubz history for her answer to things like the drunken Harry Potter and his views of American politics- and people who wear Carhartt chore jackets.
  • Lastly on the revolving blogroll is Free0352 and his soldiers take on life, liberty and liberals.

And now,

For something completely different:

So, just how much did Clint Eastwood get of my tax money?

For that 0bama re-election commercial they paid $3million per 30 second spot.
You know- this Detroit-as-a-separate country promotion.



Because nothing is made in Detroit anymore- except Muslim hotspots and Liberals.

Alright- call me a racist

Because when I saw this picture I was of two ideas.

And neither was sympathetic to anyone in that pic:
"So, when is Gods other Son going to get here?"
and
"Who is this white guy and why isn't he telling us God dayum America?"

Because- really? You think you're going to be able to drag the 97% of blacks who voted for that Chicago Jeezus to vote for some white guy who they've never heard of before?
And he's talking about respect for women and responsibility???

SRYSLY?

Sunday, February 05, 2012

The last I heard, Zurich was in Switzerland, right?

So why are these NSFW topless chicks from the Ukraine protesting there?


And I admit that I'm spoiled and all, but that guy on the far right in the second pic really needs some "help"...IYKWIMAIKYD.

"Slaves" playing hockey?
... AND they look cold. Poor girls need some hands to warm them up.......

Miit Romney and Donald Trump explain the budget

And how they are going to fix the train wreck that is the Federal Budget:



H/T to Sam.