Ron Paul (RINO-Tx) Had this bit ofB.S. explaination for his YES vote on the Terrorist Encoragement No confidence Stab our troops Anti-surge" vote.

This resolution, unfortunately, does not address the disaster in Iraq. Instead, it seeks to appear opposed to the war while at the same time offering no change of the status quo in Iraq. As such, it is not actually a vote against a troop surge. A real vote against a troop surge is a vote against the coming supplemental appropriation that finances it. I hope all of my colleagues who vote against the surge today will vote against the budgetary surge when it really counts: when we vote on the supplemental.

The biggest red herring in this debate is the constant innuendo that those who don’t support expanding the war are somehow opposing the troops. It’s nothing more than a canard to claim that those of us who struggled to prevent the bloodshed and now want it stopped are somehow less patriotic and less concerned about the welfare of our military personnel.

You can read the rest of his double-speak at the link above.
Ron, It's not only a slap in the face to the military; it's also encouraging the terrrorists who are watching the forces of anti-Americanism weaken our resolve.

But don't question his patriotism, Or his concern for troop well being.
Because if he were President, we wouldn't have to worry about things like foriegn entanglements.