Da Judge!
Here come da judge.
Here come da judge....
Everything you want in a gun,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,with flairs!
...and yes he's on my blogroll.
Sunday, February 25, 2007
People still BUY Sony cr@p?
I'd have though that after Sony's massive computer hijack attempt, that NO-ONE with any sense would trust Sony again.
I guess there are enough people out there that just beg for someone to take their money.
And complain when the cr@p they begged for isn't right...
Stolen from Hotair.
I guess there are enough people out there that just beg for someone to take their money.
And complain when the cr@p they begged for isn't right...
Stolen from Hotair.
Compensating
This post started off to be one of those meme's that seem to be getting a start on guy blogs. the one about the best and worst vehicle you ever had.
Then the idea morphed into the ugliest vehicles purposely designed to look that way.
The first on the list would have to be the 1997-2006 F-150 body style- Gawd what a butt-ugly truck , unless you're a girl-or metrosexual that like those swoopy soft feminine lines.
Next was the Hummer, in all it's 'compensational' glory. I know they're (well the H1) supposed to be the civilian version of the *real* thing, and the modern day equivalent to the CJ series. OK, I'll give you that for the H1- BUT -the H2 and H3 gimme a break!
All you're paying that money for is a Suburban or Tahoe with a boob job.
Get real. Especially you H3 owners, nothing saysgay wannabe more than a cut-rate badly designed knock-off of a military vehicle. With all the flash and pretty things added to make it look *tuff*, even though everyone knows the only time it's going off the road intentionally is when it gets washed on the lawn.
And tell me, you couldn't afford an H1 OR H2; and looked at a full length mirror and still had your 'problem', why did you have to add a 12" lift to it?
Dude! It's bad enough that you had to get the H3, but to get a cheap, backyard lift done by the local high school kids.....that's too much!
OHHhh, and when they bolted the axles back on, they didn't get them true. I don't know if you noticed when you're going down the road (since your too busy on the cell phone) that you're crabbing down the road about 3" off.
But Light needs to do a "Real Men of Genius" ad about you.
Where was I? Oh yeah ugly vehicles...
The newest Fords don't do a whole lot for me either- guess I won't be buying any Fords made after the 1995 body style.
How about an entire decade of ugly vehicles? I give you the 80's. Not only were they ugly on the outside, but they ran like cr@p, too. Except for the Ford trucks, THAT was a good truck (well unless you count the body rusting from the inside out).
How about the AMC Pacer? Remember that fishbowl?
The '56 GMC pick-up wasn't a real winner either; and speaking of GMC, when did they decide to make it the luxury version of the Chevy? Have you compared prices? Daym, and they're the ugly cousin too boot.
I seem to remember more, but can't seem to get the right make to bring up in my searches, so this'll have to do for now.
Remember, if you need to compensate for something, get a cut rate H3 and have the local H.S. kid do a bad lift job so you can be "manly".
Then the idea morphed into the ugliest vehicles purposely designed to look that way.
The first on the list would have to be the 1997-2006 F-150 body style- Gawd what a butt-ugly truck , unless you're a girl-or metrosexual that like those swoopy soft feminine lines.
Next was the Hummer, in all it's 'compensational' glory. I know they're (well the H1) supposed to be the civilian version of the *real* thing, and the modern day equivalent to the CJ series. OK, I'll give you that for the H1- BUT -the H2 and H3 gimme a break!
All you're paying that money for is a Suburban or Tahoe with a boob job.
Get real. Especially you H3 owners, nothing says
And tell me, you couldn't afford an H1 OR H2; and looked at a full length mirror and still had your 'problem', why did you have to add a 12" lift to it?
Dude! It's bad enough that you had to get the H3, but to get a cheap, backyard lift done by the local high school kids.....that's too much!
OHHhh, and when they bolted the axles back on, they didn't get them true. I don't know if you noticed when you're going down the road (since your too busy on the cell phone) that you're crabbing down the road about 3" off.
But Light needs to do a "Real Men of Genius" ad about you.
Where was I? Oh yeah ugly vehicles...
The newest Fords don't do a whole lot for me either- guess I won't be buying any Fords made after the 1995 body style.
How about an entire decade of ugly vehicles? I give you the 80's. Not only were they ugly on the outside, but they ran like cr@p, too. Except for the Ford trucks, THAT was a good truck (well unless you count the body rusting from the inside out).
How about the AMC Pacer? Remember that fishbowl?
The '56 GMC pick-up wasn't a real winner either; and speaking of GMC, when did they decide to make it the luxury version of the Chevy? Have you compared prices? Daym, and they're the ugly cousin too boot.
I seem to remember more, but can't seem to get the right make to bring up in my searches, so this'll have to do for now.
Remember, if you need to compensate for something, get a cut rate H3 and have the local H.S. kid do a bad lift job so you can be "manly".
Saturday, February 24, 2007
It's Islamo-sabbath kids!
That means today we learn about another famous pig!
This one really doesn't have a name, but the way he's portrayed fits right into the way the MoHAMmids' followers want to treat you.
As an added bonus, you'll find their version of the perfect world described in William Goldings book.
This one really doesn't have a name, but the way he's portrayed fits right into the way the MoHAMmids' followers want to treat you.
As an added bonus, you'll find their version of the perfect world described in William Goldings book.
Friday, February 23, 2007
A Boston modeling agency?
I hope she isn't one of their models.
But, then that would go to show just how advanced they are in Bostin..by not caring about how unhot their girls are....unless it's a different kind of 'talent' agency.
Ohh, and I'd hafta guess that she really liked that cop.
But, then that would go to show just how advanced they are in Bostin..by not caring about how unhot their girls are....unless it's a different kind of 'talent' agency.
Ohh, and I'd hafta guess that she really liked that cop.
Tim Hardaway hates gays!
And after the usual eruption of outrage and over the top indignation...
Funny, I don't remember hearing about NBA Basketball stdiums being burnt down, or "Heat" jerzies being burnt up. No throwing of high heels, and Tim had the sense not to turn himself in to the re-education camps.
THIS response, however could have more impact than all the in-your-face homophile legislation to date.
Uh-oh,,,, maybe they're catching on that you get more flies with honey...
Funny, I don't remember hearing about NBA Basketball stdiums being burnt down, or "Heat" jerzies being burnt up. No throwing of high heels, and Tim had the sense not to turn himself in to the re-education camps.
THIS response, however could have more impact than all the in-your-face homophile legislation to date.
Uh-oh,,,, maybe they're catching on that you get more flies with honey...
Are you wantin' even MORE Anna Nicole Smith?
Yuk,,,
Never mind, just go here and wade around youself.
I was going to do an Anna post but couldn't stand anymore of those clips...
Like I said, go wade around those clips if you want to, just be sure you've had your shots.
OHhhhhh,,,,and since were at You-tube- we can't forget to visit LonelyGirl15- can we?
Never mind, just go here and wade around youself.
I was going to do an Anna post but couldn't stand anymore of those clips...
Like I said, go wade around those clips if you want to, just be sure you've had your shots.
OHhhhhh,,,,and since were at You-tube- we can't forget to visit LonelyGirl15- can we?
Thursday, February 22, 2007
Two questions
- What were they thinking? Or were they?
- How did they get their drivers license?
Ok, three questions-
3. Do they feel stoopid?
I'd bet my next paycheck that cell phones were in volved in almost all of them...
Wednesday, February 21, 2007
There has GOT to be a way
to get in on this scam.
I'm thinking about buying about 15 acres between Hondo and Bandera for some hunting...
how about I sell "Carbon Offsets" in the form of seedlings?
Plow down the Cedar and replant with ---OOOhhhhh----- organically grown fruit!
Yessss! Get enviroweiniees to buy my orchard stock, and then not do jack-chit until I harvest. THEN sell it for MORE than the intensly cultivated produce. As a big plus, they won't care what it looks like,,,because it's "Enviromentally friendly"!
(UPDATE 10:45 AM)
OK, how about this? Plant fruit trees that deer like?...AND sell the "Free Range" pork from the wild pigs that are free for the taking?
I'm liking thisscam enviro=friendly thing better and better.
Now I just have to learn how to talk like an enviro-wienie without bursting into laughter.
I'm thinking about buying about 15 acres between Hondo and Bandera for some hunting...
how about I sell "Carbon Offsets" in the form of seedlings?
Plow down the Cedar and replant with ---OOOhhhhh----- organically grown fruit!
Yessss! Get enviroweiniees to buy my orchard stock, and then not do jack-chit until I harvest. THEN sell it for MORE than the intensly cultivated produce. As a big plus, they won't care what it looks like,,,because it's "Enviromentally friendly"!
(UPDATE 10:45 AM)
OK, how about this? Plant fruit trees that deer like?...AND sell the "Free Range" pork from the wild pigs that are free for the taking?
I'm liking this
Now I just have to learn how to talk like an enviro-wienie without bursting into laughter.
Good news for Hillary!
According to Wikipedia, the term "carpetbagger" is no longer considered derogatory.Unless, I guess, it's decribing a Democrat...
Tuesday, February 20, 2007
I found this new Liberal boycot over at John Hawkins place.
"Consumers are asked to withhold their spending for seven days, beginning on Sunday April 15 and lasting until Sunday April 22, 2007. Do NOT shop corporate outlets Minimize use of oil and gas. Carpool: bus, bike or walk. If you buy, BUY LOCALLY. Plan Ahead and Stock Up"
Ok,,, that looks like a good uncrowed week to go shopping.
Plus April 15th is Buy-a-Gun-Day!!!
Cool.
"Consumers are asked to withhold their spending for seven days, beginning on Sunday April 15 and lasting until Sunday April 22, 2007. Do NOT shop corporate outlets Minimize use of oil and gas. Carpool: bus, bike or walk. If you buy, BUY LOCALLY. Plan Ahead and Stock Up"
Ok,,, that looks like a good uncrowed week to go shopping.
Plus April 15th is Buy-a-Gun-Day!!!
Cool.
Help me out here
I saw in a(n) unremembered blog, a link to a website in Oz about ummm......assisting Libs to "help" mitigate the damage of man-made Global Climate Change.
It sounds good to me, and I'd like your help on the copy, I might even share the result$.
Basically, they said since you're stuck in the regressive America who refuses to sign-on to the Kyoto thing- that you could contribute $8 to a fund that would go to mitigate the greenhouse gasses somewhere else.
BRILLIANT!
Ok, so my idea is for those on the East and left coast to contribute to making us backwards residentsin Hondo, Tx of flyover country energy efficient by contributing to upgrading our energy using appliances and to replace gas-guzzling older model vehicles with newer, more efficient ones.
The replaced vehicle would go to replace an even MORE energy inefficient product (say a 78 F-350 dually) and get it off the road. The same goes formy a washing machine, A/C units, and many other energy using appliances.
All I need is ideas to pull onwallet heartstrings of those predisposed to help the cause, and any ideas on free websites that cater to those folks.
It sounds good to me, and I'd like your help on the copy, I might even share the result$.
Basically, they said since you're stuck in the regressive America who refuses to sign-on to the Kyoto thing- that you could contribute $8 to a fund that would go to mitigate the greenhouse gasses somewhere else.
BRILLIANT!
Ok, so my idea is for those on the East and left coast to contribute to making us backwards residents
The replaced vehicle would go to replace an even MORE energy inefficient product (say a 78 F-350 dually) and get it off the road. The same goes for
All I need is ideas to pull on
Monday, February 19, 2007
Choices
Why is it that Liberals only want to allow choice when it comes to killing babies removing 'unviable tissue masses'?
I just got forced to move to the blogger.
Because, you know- Liberals know better than you what you need.
I also had a chance to re-read their ToS and noted the future muzzeling of dissent.
2. Proper Use. You agree that you are responsible for your own use of the Service, for any posts you make, and for any consequences thereof. You agree that you will use the Service in compliance with all applicable local, state, national, and international laws, rules and regulations, including any laws regarding the transmission of technical data exported from your country of residence and all United States export control laws.
You agree to abide by the Blogger Content Policy (http://www.blogger.com/content.g) and the rules and restrictions therein. Although we may attempt to notify you when major changes are made to the Blogger Content Policy, you should periodically review the most up-to-date version. Google may, in its sole discretion, modify or revise the Blogger Content Policy at any time, and you agree to be bound by such modifications or revisions.
Violation of any of the foregoing, including the Blogger Content Policy (http://www.blogger.com/content.g), may result in immediate termination of this Agreement, and may subject you to state and federal penalties and other legal consequences. Google reserves the right, but shall have no obligation, to investigate your use of the Service in order to (a) determine whether a violation of the Agreement has occurred or (b) comply with any applicable law, regulation, legal process or governmental request.
~snip~
So, when Google gets big enough,,,,,,,Why isn't a Liberal internet monopoly as bad as a Telephone monopoly? Or, say an energy company making a profit?.........they'll be able to "modify the Content policy" to gag any blog that doesn't toe the Liberal line. Right?
Am I wrong? Look at the way Google is using it's search engine to push their chosen sites and to ignore those they disagree with.
You-tube, the same. I'd have to say that there's an overwhelming majority of clips either anti-american or pro-terrorist. Anything their Liberal, terrorist adoring audience disagrees with is pulled so fast theirs a vacume.
I'll be seriously looking for another site that costs what this blog is worth.
Namely--free.
I just got forced to move to the blogger.
Because, you know- Liberals know better than you what you need.
I also had a chance to re-read their ToS and noted the future muzzeling of dissent.
2. Proper Use. You agree that you are responsible for your own use of the Service, for any posts you make, and for any consequences thereof. You agree that you will use the Service in compliance with all applicable local, state, national, and international laws, rules and regulations, including any laws regarding the transmission of technical data exported from your country of residence and all United States export control laws.
You agree to abide by the Blogger Content Policy (http://www.blogger.com/content.g) and the rules and restrictions therein. Although we may attempt to notify you when major changes are made to the Blogger Content Policy, you should periodically review the most up-to-date version. Google may, in its sole discretion, modify or revise the Blogger Content Policy at any time, and you agree to be bound by such modifications or revisions.
Violation of any of the foregoing, including the Blogger Content Policy (http://www.blogger.com/content.g), may result in immediate termination of this Agreement, and may subject you to state and federal penalties and other legal consequences. Google reserves the right, but shall have no obligation, to investigate your use of the Service in order to (a) determine whether a violation of the Agreement has occurred or (b) comply with any applicable law, regulation, legal process or governmental request.
~snip~
So, when Google gets big enough,,,,,,,Why isn't a Liberal internet monopoly as bad as a Telephone monopoly? Or, say an energy company making a profit?.........they'll be able to "modify the Content policy" to gag any blog that doesn't toe the Liberal line. Right?
Am I wrong? Look at the way Google is using it's search engine to push their chosen sites and to ignore those they disagree with.
You-tube, the same. I'd have to say that there's an overwhelming majority of clips either anti-american or pro-terrorist. Anything their Liberal, terrorist adoring audience disagrees with is pulled so fast theirs a vacume.
I'll be seriously looking for another site that costs what this blog is worth.
Namely--free.
Sunday, February 18, 2007
Assault weapons through history
Kevin has a post that finally got me moving to make this short history of assault weapons... just to keep things in perspective.
This was most likely the first type of assault weapon in history.
Next was probably something alone these lines...
Then they found a way to kill at a distance.
Adding a handle made the killing more efficient.
Then we get into metalergy.
...And the science of aerodynamics!
Which came before the science of pyrotechnics and ballistics.
With firearms used on both sides of good and evil.
Is some arbitrary idea that adding a bananna clip, or making it black , or ugly more deadly than long and lean?
Assault weapons were'nt always used by the military only, or for killing human beings. Most make good hunting rifles.
Because when you boil it all down, it's not the weapon it's self that's dangerous, it's the one using it.
This was most likely the first type of assault weapon in history.
Next was probably something alone these lines...
Then they found a way to kill at a distance.
Adding a handle made the killing more efficient.
Then we get into metalergy.
...And the science of aerodynamics!
Which came before the science of pyrotechnics and ballistics.
With firearms used on both sides of good and evil.
Is some arbitrary idea that adding a bananna clip, or making it black , or ugly more deadly than long and lean?
Assault weapons were'nt always used by the military only, or for killing human beings. Most make good hunting rifles.
Because when you boil it all down, it's not the weapon it's self that's dangerous, it's the one using it.
I just *KNOW* you've talked to this guy
Mujibar was trying to get a job in India.
The Personnel Manager said, "Mujibar, you have
passed all the tests, except one. Unless you pass
it you cannot qualify for this job."
Mujibar said, "I am ready"
The manager said, "Make a sentence using the
words Yellow, Pink and Green."
Mujibar thought for a few minutes and said,
"Mister manager, I am ready"
The manager said, "Go ahead."
Mujibar said, "The telephone goes green, green,
and I pink it up, and say, 'Yellow, this is Mujibar.'"
Mujibar now works as a technician at a call
center for computer problems.
No doubt you have spoken to him. I have.
This'll have to do for a while- got something on my mind, don't know if there'll be a post about it, or not.
At least I'm not completely p*ssed off any more.
The Personnel Manager said, "Mujibar, you have
passed all the tests, except one. Unless you pass
it you cannot qualify for this job."
Mujibar said, "I am ready"
The manager said, "Make a sentence using the
words Yellow, Pink and Green."
Mujibar thought for a few minutes and said,
"Mister manager, I am ready"
The manager said, "Go ahead."
Mujibar said, "The telephone goes green, green,
and I pink it up, and say, 'Yellow, this is Mujibar.'"
Mujibar now works as a technician at a call
center for computer problems.
No doubt you have spoken to him. I have.
This'll have to do for a while- got something on my mind, don't know if there'll be a post about it, or not.
At least I'm not completely p*ssed off any more.
Saturday, February 17, 2007
Great!
Now i'm getting spam from a thing I put in Craigslist.
NO! I don't want to buy v1agra.
I'm not the slightest bit interested.
Go away.
Stop bothering me.
NO! I don't want to buy v1agra.
I'm not the slightest bit interested.
Go away.
Stop bothering me.
Ron Paul (RINO-Tx) Had this bit ofB.S. explaination for his YES vote on the Terrorist Encoragement No confidence Stab our troops Anti-surge" vote.
This resolution, unfortunately, does not address the disaster in Iraq. Instead, it seeks to appear opposed to the war while at the same time offering no change of the status quo in Iraq. As such, it is not actually a vote against a troop surge. A real vote against a troop surge is a vote against the coming supplemental appropriation that finances it. I hope all of my colleagues who vote against the surge today will vote against the budgetary surge when it really counts: when we vote on the supplemental.
The biggest red herring in this debate is the constant innuendo that those who don’t support expanding the war are somehow opposing the troops. It’s nothing more than a canard to claim that those of us who struggled to prevent the bloodshed and now want it stopped are somehow less patriotic and less concerned about the welfare of our military personnel.
You can read the rest of his double-speak at the link above.
Ron, It's not only a slap in the face to the military; it's also encouraging the terrrorists who are watching the forces of anti-Americanism weaken our resolve.
But don't question his patriotism, Or his concern for troop well being.
Because if he were President, we wouldn't have to worry about things like foriegn entanglements.
This resolution, unfortunately, does not address the disaster in Iraq. Instead, it seeks to appear opposed to the war while at the same time offering no change of the status quo in Iraq. As such, it is not actually a vote against a troop surge. A real vote against a troop surge is a vote against the coming supplemental appropriation that finances it. I hope all of my colleagues who vote against the surge today will vote against the budgetary surge when it really counts: when we vote on the supplemental.
The biggest red herring in this debate is the constant innuendo that those who don’t support expanding the war are somehow opposing the troops. It’s nothing more than a canard to claim that those of us who struggled to prevent the bloodshed and now want it stopped are somehow less patriotic and less concerned about the welfare of our military personnel.
You can read the rest of his double-speak at the link above.
Ron, It's not only a slap in the face to the military; it's also encouraging the terrrorists who are watching the forces of anti-Americanism weaken our resolve.
But don't question his patriotism, Or his concern for troop well being.
Because if he were President, we wouldn't have to worry about things like foriegn entanglements.
Happy Sabbath, Muslimbs
Since this is the "Year of the Pig" I guess this is a good day to tell you about
Pippo is a storyteller has his own apartment and lives next to a big park!
He's one of *Hello Kitty's* friends.
Pippo is a storyteller has his own apartment and lives next to a big park!
He's one of *Hello Kitty's* friends.
Friday, February 16, 2007
All I can say is WTF?
?
Oh, he's German...or something.
Why would anyone do this to an Opal?
An OPAL?
Oh, yeah-he's German, or something.
It's not like they have *real* trucks over there...
(UPDATE)
You may wonder why I'm posting so early- considering I work at night.
Some self centered individual decided that 6:30AM was a good time to be running and playing with the dogs. I'll most likely be up until 3AM now. Or about 3 hours after I drop off my last load.
Oh, he's German...or something.
Why would anyone do this to an Opal?
An OPAL?
Oh, yeah-he's German, or something.
It's not like they have *real* trucks over there...
(UPDATE)
You may wonder why I'm posting so early- considering I work at night.
Some self centered individual decided that 6:30AM was a good time to be running and playing with the dogs. I'll most likely be up until 3AM now. Or about 3 hours after I drop off my last load.
Thursday, February 15, 2007
If they're against it, it must be good
The Texas Branch of the A.C.L.U is against Texas House Bill 29 which is trying to do *something* at least about the anchor baby scam that illegals are using to defraud American taxpayers.
It's hypocritically amusing to see that the ACLU is using it's 'love' of the Constitution to sway public opinion.
HB 28 would take away several state benefits from children born in Texasto parents who entered the United Statesin violation of Federal law. It is in fact also an attempt to set up a legal challenge to the current interpretation of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The ACLU of Texas opposes HB 28 because it:
-Ignores American legal tradition and disrespects the Constitution
-Will unnecessarily cost the state of Texas money
-Punishes innocent children for the choices of their parents.
These are the same people who use the Constitution to force their brand of anti-American values down our throats no matter how much it costs -AND- they get our tax money for doing it. So I guess I can understand where they're coming from on the "cost the state of Texas money", since they'll be the ones sueing the state for whatever they can strongarm out of us.
I'd like to remind everyone that the original intent was to ensure that the recently freed slaves (of 1865) weren't discriminated against by the same Democratic party that has been using and abusing them ever since they've been in America.
Whatever happened to the Liberal view that the Constitution was a 'living, breathing document' and that 'it needs to change with the times'?
The Constitution has been changed before, and it will be again. This wouldn't be the first time an amendment was repealed for the good of the country.
It's time to look at modifying the 14th Amendment and deny automatic citizenship to those who's first act in the country is breaking our laws.
H/T to Murray
UPDATE- Here's the bill from the Tx Leg website
It's hypocritically amusing to see that the ACLU is using it's 'love' of the Constitution to sway public opinion.
HB 28 would take away several state benefits from children born in Texasto parents who entered the United Statesin violation of Federal law. It is in fact also an attempt to set up a legal challenge to the current interpretation of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The ACLU of Texas opposes HB 28 because it:
-Ignores American legal tradition and disrespects the Constitution
-Will unnecessarily cost the state of Texas money
-Punishes innocent children for the choices of their parents.
These are the same people who use the Constitution to force their brand of anti-American values down our throats no matter how much it costs -AND- they get our tax money for doing it. So I guess I can understand where they're coming from on the "cost the state of Texas money", since they'll be the ones sueing the state for whatever they can strongarm out of us.
I'd like to remind everyone that the original intent was to ensure that the recently freed slaves (of 1865) weren't discriminated against by the same Democratic party that has been using and abusing them ever since they've been in America.
Whatever happened to the Liberal view that the Constitution was a 'living, breathing document' and that 'it needs to change with the times'?
The Constitution has been changed before, and it will be again. This wouldn't be the first time an amendment was repealed for the good of the country.
It's time to look at modifying the 14th Amendment and deny automatic citizenship to those who's first act in the country is breaking our laws.
H/T to Murray
UPDATE- Here's the bill from the Tx Leg website
Wednesday, February 14, 2007
She has to have a place on my blogroll
Right thinking girl just distilled Anna Nicole-smith down to one sentence in a post of rememberences.
Dressed in a black that hinted of Baudelaire and Sartre, not of a grieving widow trying to gain sympathy in a courtroom, she won a Supreme Court victory that stunned legal scholars as well as tabloid reporters who were thrilled to learn that Washington DC is as much a make-believe place as Hollywood. It was a place where a multi-millionaire stripper could win justice. ‘A deal’s a deal’, the court seemed to say, and handed Smith the opportunity to claim millions of her deceased 90 year old husband’s fortune. In trailer parks all over America, little girls grinned at the teevee and for a moment, believed that dreams can come true.
Dressed in a black that hinted of Baudelaire and Sartre, not of a grieving widow trying to gain sympathy in a courtroom, she won a Supreme Court victory that stunned legal scholars as well as tabloid reporters who were thrilled to learn that Washington DC is as much a make-believe place as Hollywood. It was a place where a multi-millionaire stripper could win justice. ‘A deal’s a deal’, the court seemed to say, and handed Smith the opportunity to claim millions of her deceased 90 year old husband’s fortune. In trailer parks all over America, little girls grinned at the teevee and for a moment, believed that dreams can come true.
That's it!
I'm f'ing tired of the Leftist slant I hear every frigging time I hear the news.
I'm tired of hearing about some drug addicted slut who's ONLY claim to fame was a pair of silocone enhanced set of modified sweat glands. (boobs for the biologically challenged)
From now on my ONLY source of news is going to be here.
And aside from C/Ds, music from here.
OHhhhhh,,,,,,and since they're already doing the 2008 pre-pre-election coverage, I think I'll just fill my ears with expanding foam and stick a fork in my eyes.
I'm tired of hearing about some drug addicted slut who's ONLY claim to fame was a pair of silocone enhanced set of modified sweat glands. (boobs for the biologically challenged)
From now on my ONLY source of news is going to be here.
And aside from C/Ds, music from here.
OHhhhhh,,,,,,and since they're already doing the 2008 pre-pre-election coverage, I think I'll just fill my ears with expanding foam and stick a fork in my eyes.
Tuesday, February 13, 2007
I see that the world can't stop their collective ob-gasm
Because Barak Obama announced his candidacy this week-end.
Can I remind you of something?
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
NOVEMBER 2008 ---Which is TWENTY months away, over a year and a half from now.
Can I remind you of something?
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
NOVEMBER 2008 ---Which is TWENTY months away, over a year and a half from now.
Monday, February 12, 2007
How the worm turns
This Republican had this to say about a Democratic President:
...who defeated 81 Democrats in a procedural vote on an amendment to send a routine resolution back to committee with instructions for the committee to add the words "a war unnecessarily and unconstitutionally begun by the President of the United States." The amendment passed, but the bill never reemerged from committee and was never finally voted upon.[13]
Lincoln damaged his reputation by an intemperate speech in the House. He announced, "God of Heaven has forgotten to defend the weak and innocent, and permitted the strong band of murderers and demons from hell to kill men, women, and children, and lay waste and pillage the land of the just."
Peacenick? Nahhh, just parisan at that time.
But he changed-
When the spring campaigns all turned into bloody stalemates, Lincoln strongly supported Grant's strategy of wearing down Lee's army at the cost of heavy Union casualties. Lincoln easily defeated efforts to deny his renomination, and selected Andrew Johnson, a War Democrat from the Southern state of Tennessee as his running mate in order to form a broader coalition. They ran on the new Union Party ticket; it was a coalition of Republicans and War Democrats.
Republicans across the country had the jitters in August, fearing that Lincoln would be defeated. Acknowledging those fears, Lincoln wrote and signed a pledge that, if he should lose the election, he would nonetheless defeat the Confederacy by an all-out military effort before turning over the White House.[28]
But, the more they change, the more they also stay the same.
Thank you Abe.
...who defeated 81 Democrats in a procedural vote on an amendment to send a routine resolution back to committee with instructions for the committee to add the words "a war unnecessarily and unconstitutionally begun by the President of the United States." The amendment passed, but the bill never reemerged from committee and was never finally voted upon.[13]
Lincoln damaged his reputation by an intemperate speech in the House. He announced, "God of Heaven has forgotten to defend the weak and innocent, and permitted the strong band of murderers and demons from hell to kill men, women, and children, and lay waste and pillage the land of the just."
Peacenick? Nahhh, just parisan at that time.
But he changed-
When the spring campaigns all turned into bloody stalemates, Lincoln strongly supported Grant's strategy of wearing down Lee's army at the cost of heavy Union casualties. Lincoln easily defeated efforts to deny his renomination, and selected Andrew Johnson, a War Democrat from the Southern state of Tennessee as his running mate in order to form a broader coalition. They ran on the new Union Party ticket; it was a coalition of Republicans and War Democrats.
Republicans across the country had the jitters in August, fearing that Lincoln would be defeated. Acknowledging those fears, Lincoln wrote and signed a pledge that, if he should lose the election, he would nonetheless defeat the Confederacy by an all-out military effort before turning over the White House.[28]
But, the more they change, the more they also stay the same.
Thank you Abe.
Happy Year of the PIG
Yep, it's the Chinese Year of the Pig for all of 2007.
So jihad this you of the "Religion of Perpetual offendedness"
Meet Gordy, he was Babe's competition back in 1995.
So jihad this you of the "Religion of Perpetual offendedness"
Meet Gordy, he was Babe's competition back in 1995.
Sunday, February 11, 2007
Firefox cure
I had been having problems with F/F on the main computer, well, since I had to restore it from a trojan.
I found out from the warning on Majorgeeks that the problem could be from F/F it's self. That was probably why I was having so many problems loading pages.
I uinstalled that version and installed version 1.5.0.9 from here (top of the "old version" list), since it works well on the laptop.
If you downloaded version 2.0.0.1 and are having problems, try an earlier version- it could really help. It will remember your settings, so it's not that big of a deal.
Now, back to working on my pending paternity attempt.
I found out from the warning on Majorgeeks that the problem could be from F/F it's self. That was probably why I was having so many problems loading pages.
I uinstalled that version and installed version 1.5.0.9 from here (top of the "old version" list), since it works well on the laptop.
If you downloaded version 2.0.0.1 and are having problems, try an earlier version- it could really help. It will remember your settings, so it's not that big of a deal.
Now, back to working on my pending paternity attempt.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
