I wasn't really interested in this story about the hair extension trail.
I looked at to see what ABCs take on it was, and found it surprisingly ambivalent to the ... ummm.... profiteering going on from poor (dot) Indian women's hair. ($227 a pound)
I also noticed that they had to take the usual swipe at religion:
While a number of temples can give evidence that the money does help the community in some way, it is impossible to tell whether it all really goes where it is meant to go.
Anybody remember the last time the Lamestreem Media had anything like that to say about the .gov?
No comments:
Post a Comment